|
Financial Assistance requested
Governmental Injustice - Incarceration - Dan Gibson is spending 37 months on work release for conspiracy to defraud the government. Dan is a rescuer who runs a school that teaches pro-life Christians how to defend themselves in court. He was singled out and prosecuted for this in a highly illegal trial. 
Bodies, Sex, and Babies - Question: Is a pre-born person with a different genetic identity and possibly with a different sex and blood type, etc. a part of its mother's body like a heart or a lung, a finger or a foot, or is he or she a separate individual residing in a temporary home receiving natural shelter, warmth, nourishment and hopefully protection? Would it be wrong for a woman to cut off an arm or a leg without sufficient reason? Such an action would be considered gravely immoral. In our present age a person's own mother's womb is the most dangerous and violent place one is ever apt to live. If Lisa Buckner is correct (and I do not agree with her) in saying that teen-age girls are not physically or mentally able to have sex, much less have babies, then I believe that a practice, or even laws, should be established similar to those of past eras when young girls were chaperoned. This would be true particularly at times during their monthly cycles when their hormones are taking charge of their minds and encouraging them: 1) to enhance and display their assets, I believe that this aspect of hormonal activity in women, particularly young women whose minds are still immature, is little recognized. A woman needs to understand her vulnerability during periods of heightened desire for social activity particularly when unmarried or around a man who is not her husband. Pre-menopausal women, particularly those with young daughters, should evaluate their own cyclic emotions, ambitions, desires in relation to men and also the noticeable actions of their teenage daughter(s) for a cycle or two. I believe that those with good moral values will become far more restrictive in regard to their daughter's social freedom. For research purposes it would be good if records were kept and a summary of findings forwarded to this office. These findings would then be forwarded to sociologists, etc. upon request. Commentaries or questions will be appreciated. Fathers should also be aware of their daughters natural desire for affection and not misconstrue it as a desire for sexual activity. They should keep their own instincts under control and see to it that their daughters are protected from their own vulnerability. The Biblical proscriptions in regard to incest should always be clearly kept in mind. Sons, while still young enough to be open to learning regarding sexual matters should be taught these proscriptions. Sexual activity is always to be taken seriously. It should never be made the topic for jokes or spoken of lightly. In our enlightened age we still fail to recognize the natural rhythms of the body which are designed by God for the purpose of procreation. Self-control, i.e., self-restraint, should be taught and practiced even during marriage. The admonitions of Scripture (Lev 15:19, 24,25,28; 18:19; 20:18; 15:18) make it clear that self-control is to be practiced regularly during marriage. Lack of the practice of regular self-control on the part of males is responsible for many unhappy homes and marriages. Human Myopia - Pro-abortion / pro-choice enthusiasts have
convinced the The Church, the pro-life movement, and society as a whole are caught up with unreasonable pacifism. We recognize the horrors of war and tell ourselves that we want to avoid conflict no matter the cost to other human life so long as it is not ourselves or those who are near us that are being affected. Christians as a whole are neither Quakers nor Mennonites who have traditionally professed absolute pacifism. The degree of peace we presently enjoy exists because our forbearers were willing to fight great wars to bring a higher degree of justice into the world than already existed. Having become comfortable with the security we possess, which was fought for by our ancestors, we are now unwilling to fight for the justice due to others. Our leaders are too often caught up in the humanness of our lives. They give us what we ask for knowing full well that future generations will suffer because of our present selfishness. Our Church leaders have greatest culpability. They were ordained to be pastors who would protect their flocks from the invasion of evil influences even if it meant their own persecution as spoken of in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:9-12). However, these very pastors are the ones who have opened the door to evil by their continuing silence. Worst of all they have failed to purge their own ranks of unbelievers (Antichrists). Truth has become passe. The lies of silence prevail. Popular misconceptions -- 1. We are living in a democracy and should handle our disagreements through the lawful political system. Comment: When the disagreement concerns the legal murder of over 4,000 innocent human beings each day, it is not reasonable to wait ten or twenty or more years until justice is obtained for the unborn through a political process. Over thirty million innocent brothers and sisters have already been murdered while well meaning Christians and other pro-lifers(?) have continually failed by using "civil" means. Those who claim to be pro-life and can let their innocent brothers and sisters be murdered each day had better quickly re-examine their own relationship with God and eternal life. Cowards do not enter Heaven. (Rev 21:8) 2. Democracy vs morality. Question: Who is it that can pass the sentence of eternal damnation upon members of the human race? Should unjust civil law take precedence over just moral law? 3. The fetus is a part of a woman's body and women should have the right of control over their own bodies. Note: See section entitled Bodies, Sex & Babies and refer to the Question section and the following paragraph. 4. It is wrong to murder abortion providers, they are innocent persons. Comment: Practicing abortion providers are understood to be murderers by at least half of the population. The religious teachings of most of these people affirm this as truth. The government has interfered with clear religious beliefs in opposition to the concept of separation of Church and State according to the Constitution. The government has condoned the murder of the unborn. To kill someone who is known to have committed or participated in murder in the past in defense of those about to be murdered is not theologically to be considered murder, but rather falls into the category of defense of the innocent, a meritorious act. Commentary taken from article, In Defense of Others, published in Life Advocate magazine, Oct. 1993: "The word "kill" (ratsach) in the 5th/6th Commandment is one of seven Hebrew words in the Old Testament (OT) used to describe the taking of life in one way or another. It is important to define the specific meaning of this word to determine if this Law was actually violated by Paul Hill, Shelley Shannon, and Michael Griffin. Ratsach appears 47 times in the OT. It is never used in the context of legitimate war, or in the case of self-defense (Ex 22:2), accidental killing (Dt 19:5), or in the execution of a person who has forfeited his life by "shedding man's blood" (Gn 9:6). It is also not used in the text describing how Moses slayed the Egyptian taskmaster (Ex 2:12). All of these Scriptures use a different word not found in the Sixth Commandment. And clearly Scripture supports certain kinds of killing as viscerally regrettable but righteous nevertheless.
The deaths of abortion providers may morally be considered as permanently rendering them incapable of murdering innocent preborn babies. If there is a better way to immediately accomplish the goal of defending the innocent then I encourage it to be published and practiced immediately. 5. Dr. Pamela Maraldo, President of Planned Parenthood the largest abortion provider in the America, has called for and end to the climate of fear and violence. Comment: If she is sincere she would immediately stop causing the unborn to fear the invasion of a suction tube into their home. A tube which is intended to subject them to the violence of being torn limb from limb. This is what the unborn are being subjected to on a daily basis. 6. Freedom of personal choice. Comment: The type of choice they desire is to be able to murder the unborn with impunity. There is no choice allowed for those incapable of speaking out in their own defense to protest against cruel injustice. 7. Access must be maintained to women's health services. Comment: General women's health services are available from many sources including the government which often makes them free to the poor. The primary service of abortion clinics is abortion for profit of providers. The babies health is not given any consideration. 8. The anti-aborts are a small extremist group imposing violence on the rest of us. Comment: This statement in effect states that all but a very small group favors abortion and that the small groups' primary interest is violence rather than the saving of innocent human life. Information Request - LEU - News & Notes is published by: Because of the recent shootings in Brookline, Mass. I have not yet had the opportunity to finish setting up a computer bulletin board service (BBS). More on this in our next issue. Contributions (a tithe from those who do not have pastors actively defending the innocent in the womb) are needed in order for this ministry to be sustained and grow. Public education is costly. Many thanks to all who have contributed this past month. Your continued support however is still needed and valued. If you desire your donations to be tax deductible please make your check to Life Enterprises Unlimited (or LEU). If you know of others who would be interested in receiving this newsletter, please list their names and addresses on a separate sheet and mail it at your earliest convenience. T.V. Appearance - Restraining Order - Quotable - Anarchy, the absence of (just) government and a state of lawlessness (morally speaking), is inherent in the pro-choice position. No anti-abortionist desires freedom from just law or government.  We were created to be brothers & sisters of Jesus.
 Editor
|
government that it is alright to kill
(murder, depending upon point of view) living
human cells with RNA, DNA, i.e., full genetic
identity, that is or would unquestionably become a
human person at least at birth. Granted their is
disagreement as to when human personhood
begins, but, the concern which has not been
adequately addressed, regardless of ones beliefs,
is, "Why is it acceptable to kill known human life
when their is no proof that human personhood
does not exist?"
The word, ratsach, does refer to killing for revenge (Nm 35:27, 30), and
the premeditated killing of an innocent person (2 Kings 6:32). Therefore,
when the Word says, "It is mine to avenge, I will repay, says the Lord"
(Rom 12:19) there is a direct connection and precaution against usurping
the role of God that relates directly to this Sixth Commandment. Only
two lines later there is a designation as to whom God has delegated
authority to in order to avenge wrongs done (Rom 13:1). The
government then, and not the individual, has the right to punish for past
offenses. Likewise, there is a similar pattern in Scripture that condemns
those like abortionists who "lie in wait for some one's blood" (Prov 1:11),
and it is specified that "The Lord hates... hands that shed innocent blood" (Prov 6:17)."
