|
Financial Assistance requested
![]() Few Catholics, including Pope John Paul II (Karol Wojtyla), seem to understand the difference between authoritative teaching and the various levels of personal opinion.1 The pope and many Catholic cardinals and bishops are in opposition to capital punishment. This early command of God has been approved by the practice of Catholics and through the teachings of the Church from its foundation. In the minds of many, a pope is believed to speak with infallibility. However, this concept is untrue except under a very limited set of conditions that are always under the control of the Holy Spirit. When a pope speaks personally or is addressing a group of people his words are to be given thoughtful consideration, but, there is no requirement to blindly accept that what he is saying is in accordance with God's will. Having accepted the Catholic understanding that popes have been authorized by Jesus to make infallible universal declarations on matters of faith and morals, that are duly recorded and witnessed, I present the following position: In order to avoid being considered a hypocrite for asking people to go against Scriptural requirements concerning the death penalty, Pope John Paul II should "attempt" * to make an infallible declaration against the death penalty. If he believes that there are specific crimes that would call for capital punishment, he should state at least two or three examples of crimes where the death penalty would be morally acceptable. * The word "attempt" is used as a qualifier as it is believed that he will not only be unable to make such a declaration, but that by making the attempt he risks the loss of both temporal and eternal life.Should he not make his position an infallible teaching of the Church, he should publicly acknowledge his error and do public penance. One of the earliest commands of God was -- "If anyone sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; For in the image of God has man been made." Genesis 9:6. (God's Word should be considered as unchangeable even by an "enlightened" generation.) Since this teaching must be viewed as an infallible teaching, the only way to oppose capital punishment is to somehow diminish or make a substitution for this infallible teaching.
Capital punishment called "cruel and unnecessary"John Paul II's belief that capital punishment is "cruel and unnecessary 2 " is illustrative of a diminished belief in God. When comparing a simple execution, even of the most heinous type, with the eternal torture of Hell it should be clear that capital punishment is not cruel for it serves good ends.
The wisdom of God known to us through His just laws must never be referred to as unnecessary. God is the creator and has the perfect right to take life when He so chooses, and, He also has full right to order that it be taken under certain conditions. To believe otherwise is illustrative of either a weak faith, or a total lack of faith in God. The Catholic Church teaches that God is immutable (unchangeable). When both the consistent practice of the Church and the Sacred Scriptures 3 given full approval by the Church teach in favor of capital punishment for grave crimes, then it must be understood that those in opposition to those teachings have set themselves up as false Gods, the gravest of all crimes as established in the First Commandment.
John Paul II trip to St. Louis, USA in January 1999. Consistent practice of the Church and the Sacred Scriptures: Which is the real Pope John Paul II ? Do Not Murder God's Justice in relation to Capital Punishment The Adulterous Woman
Entry Page HOME Site Map E-MAIL: Copyright © 1993-2003 by Father David C. Trosch - All Rights Reserved Permissions granted for non-profit purposes. http://www.trosch.org This web site is produced and provided as a service by Life Enterprises Unlimited.
|