|
Financial Assistance Requested
CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENTwhich provesPREBORN HUMAN BEINGS have LEGAL PERSONHOOD with ENTITLEMENT to FULL PROTECTION OF the LAW. * * * * * Articles in addition TO, and AMENDMENT of the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA, PROPOSED by CONGRESS and RATIFIED by the LEGISLATURES of the SEVERAL STATES, PURSUANT to the FIFTH ARTICLE of the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION. Article XIV. SECTION 1. All or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive , liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to ANY Person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The reference to "all persons born" clearly RESPECTS the existence of unborn persons in addition to the class of people referred to as born persons.
The two references to "any person" are not restrictive to citizens of the United States of America. It would equally include traveling persons, alien persons in residence, and persons not yet born. It is clear that the personhood of fetuses is hereby established and that these preborn persons residing in the jurisdiction of the United States of America have constitutional protection as to their right to life and equal protection under the laws of this nation.  ARGUMENTATION relating to $53 Million Law Suit by Abortionist.Includes Doctrine and Legal Presentations. IE (Internet Explorer) Argumentation U. S. Constitution Declaration of Independence John Brown & Paul Hill - Abolitionists Permissions granted for non-profit purposes.  Editor |
